Trust
Uganda Guide Editorial Policy
How Uganda Guide handles sourcing, freshness, corrections, and affiliate disclosure.
The editorial standard is simple: practical Uganda guidance should be sourced, dated, and honest about uncertainty. Affiliate and quote links should be clearly labeled.
Source priority
Primary first
Freshness rule
Meaningful review
Affiliate links
Clearly labeled
Source hierarchy
Primary and official sources come first for pricing, access rules, wildlife authority guidance, and immigration details. Independent corroboration supports context, but not at the expense of the primary source.
If a claim cannot be supported cleanly, it should be softened, removed, or marked as planning judgment rather than presented as fact.
Freshness and review discipline
Pages that contain time-sensitive planning detail should show meaningful update discipline. A freshness signal should correspond to actual editorial work, not decorative timestamp churn.
Booking links and disclosures
Uganda Guide keeps booking links outside the factual guidance and labels affiliate relationships. Gorilla Planner links are shown for readers who want route comparison or a quote.
- No operator directory as the core product feature.
- No aggressive quote capture inside general Uganda guidance.
- No duplicated Rwanda comparison pages inside the Uganda property.
Corrections and restraint
If a fact changes or a source goes stale, the preferred behavior is to correct the page quickly and narrow the claim where needed. Editorial restraint is part of the product, not a weakness in it.
What this means on the page
A good Uganda Guide page should make it obvious what is factual, what is planning judgment, and where a live re-check still belongs. That is why update dates, primary links, and softer wording matter so much in travel content.
The product is allowed to be selective. It does not need to sound total in order to be useful.
Useful next reads
Frequently asked questions
Does Uganda Guide try to be neutral even when commercial links exist?+
It stays editorial until the user reaches compare or quote intent. The boundary is meant to be explicit, not disguised inside informational content.
What happens when a source is stale or mixed?+
The claim should be narrowed, qualified, or removed. The policy favors honesty about uncertainty over artificial certainty.